Does this count as a grade?
Today’s key topic “What is your philosophy on assessment?” Well, actually, “What is my philosophy on
assessment?
I am certainly of the era that schools are all about
assessment and ranking. Homework was graded and recorded. Pop quizzes would
make sure kids were staying up on the material. Tests were long and covered a
whole bunch of material. And of course, ALL THIS WENT ON YOUR PERMANENT RECORD!
My first real thought of the differences between formative
and summative assessments came while checking my kids grades online during
their middle school years. I saw these different categories and thought, “Well,
that’s different.” I didn’t spend a whole lot of time figuring out how much
formatives went into their grades, since I was mainly concerned about the boys
getting their homework done and turned in. But the concept of assessing to
check progress just seemed natural to me. In the business world, this should be
done all the time as a manager. I would meet with my direct reports every week
to check on how they were doing on their goals. These frequent meetings weren’t
an opportunity to rate them every week, but a chance to find out what they
needed to be successful at the end of the year. That final check was the biggie,
or summative assessment. Of course, the model was a bit different because we
had documented mid-term reviews that… YADDA, YADDA, YADDA ... so really, it was
close enough.
With this background, I see frequent formative assessments as
a crucial step in helping people succeed. Recording the FA’s so both the assessee
and assessor agree on status and know where improvement is needed also is internalized
into my thought processes. I always worked to make sure that when time came for
the big rating, everybody knew where they stood because of our ongoing dialog
and action plans.
The very first course I took in the C&I program was Into
to Assessments. Maybe because it was first or maybe because it was a good
connection between my management style and education, but every time we have
discussed assessments since then, it makes sense. Check often to see if people understand
and are progressing. Don’t make these checks something that the assessee is afraid
to be truthful about – it’s OK to say you don’t know what’s going on. Use that
information to design a plan to get them from where they are to where they need
to be. At the end, if the process was
done correctly, you end up with a final rating that says the person met the goals,
which you then formally document and pass on.
If only we didn’t need that last step. If school was
designed to get students to understand instead of to earn grades, ….
The articles by Alfie Kohn (this
and this)
really got me thinking about how great that would be. If only the summative
assessment was just an indication that the student mastered the required
material and not a rating of how they did compared to the other students. While
I don’t know how much I’ll be able to move a school to the ungraded philosophy,
I know that I’ll always use an absolute grading technique. There is enough competition
in the world outside education. Inside our bubble, we should use assessment as
tool to assist learning, not to pigeon-hole students.
Comments
Post a Comment